The managers fought that Trai's data, which were conveyed on the controller's site on Thursday, don't portray the bona fide execution of their frameworks and there was a wide distinction between the results of the tests done by them and those by the controller.
Investigating the disclosures of the audit accessible to return to work drops done at the order of Trai, the telecom players, through industry bodies COAI and AUSPI, have upheld their position, saying their own drive test reports are conflicting with the regulator's.
By Telecom Authoritative Force of India (Trai), most telecom overseers, including state-run MTNL, failed subjective drive tests drove by it to check nature of their framework and organizations as a part of its tries to control the call drop risk.
As indicated by the test report, none of telecom directors showed change in call drops in Mumbai, Pune and Bhubaneswar.
The directors combat that the results set up on the site don't give the honest to goodness picture as outcomes of the way of organization (QoS) parameters moved.
"This is despite the way that tests were coordinated on the same courses and using the same reasoning as got by the Trai-chose workplaces," the letter said.
The letter further said regardless of the way that its part heads' comments, nearby drive test reports depicting the inverse results, have been disseminated on the site, these don't find any notification in the reports of the associations chose by Trai, which "gives out a wrong impression to individuals by and large".
On their part, the managers have asked for drive test logs and diverse purposes of enthusiasm from the controller, however so far Trai has not obliged.
"It is frustrating that instead of giving the logs to telecom organization suppliers, Trai has circulated our requesting to give the logs. This procedure for circulated insufficient drive test reports and head comments close by is misdirecting, incorrectly and misrepresentative of honest to goodness execution of QoS parameters of the part directors' framework," the letter said.
It incorporated this will simply provoke perplexity achieving "incorrectly acumen" and might hurt the brand picture of versatile executives.
The letter discussed the necessity for trade off between 'head drove tests', which are controlled by the same greatly overseers, and the free drive test results.
"It is important that we (both the controller and the chairman) suit the generous change between the two test results for any critical result and huge steps," it included.
The heads are of the point of view that unless the logs are shared and separated, the results should not be appropriated.
The controller had driven drive tests in the midst of December-January this money related on select courses of seven urban regions, including Delhi, Mumbai, Pune, Surat, Bhubaneswar and Indore, and bestowed the revelations to telecom heads.
As indicated by the Trai benchmark, not more than 2 percent approaches a telecom executive's framework should get subsequently confined. The controller coordinated tests on both 2G and 3G arrangement of associations.
The heads in like manner searched for change in logic in coordinating the drive tests.
"Remembering the final objective to ensure an extensive point of view of framework, the drive test should be coordinated within the city furthest reaches of the city and should cover all the genuine courses and should not be compelled by the amount obviously kilometer," it said.
The letter said that in the meeting with Head of telecom associations, Trai had agreed to incorporate the chairmen at every period of the movement, including the course conclusion, and in the midst of testing.
"Proceeding, if it is wanted to lead these drive tests as often as possible, it is all the more important that we have a distinct trade on the centers raised by us and get in contact at a generally agreed comprehension as for the courses to be picked, outright drive test instruments and framework before further modifies of testing," it proposed.
